Business case

APANOMALIES

Client challenge:The client needed to hit their savings target, AP was a potential area of opportunity, but internal bandwidth was unable to deal with addressing this manually. The focus was dealing with the incoming AP spend and existing work.

Product usedAP

Zero integrationContingency basedROI in 10 working days

TALK TO HUNTERAI TEAM
CategoryHealthcare services
hunterAIEvery spend leaks.
hunterAI hunts.

At a glance

Turned historical AP leakage into recovered cash and continuous financial control

The client recovered previously missed value, reduced manual AP effort, and established continuous anomaly monitoring across a high-volume accounts payable environment.

Payment anomalies revealed recurring gaps in AP controls

The analysis exposed payment anomalies and the underlying process gaps that allowed them to pass through existing controls.

These included:

  • Duplicate payments bypassing ERP alerts through slight invoice variations
  • Inconsistent vendor master records created by multiple supplier legal entities
  • Supplier credits that were not connected back to AP records
  • Invoice-entry errors and complex coding of corrections

Instead of treating individual duplicate payments as isolated exceptions, the client gained visibility into the recurring patterns creating financial leakage across the AP process.

Traditional controls could not detect anomalies at scale

Existing AP controls relied on selective sampling, manual audits, and standard ERP checks.

Across more than two million transactions and approximately $1.2B in annual AP spend, those controls could not consistently identify slight invoice variations, duplicate payments, or process breakdowns at scale.

As a result, payment issues were often discovered only after the fact, limiting both recovery and the ability to prevent the same errors from recurring.

1.1M invoices · 2.3M transactions, read line by line. The anomalies are the rare lit lines — individually invisible, collectively the recovery.

  • Duplicate & erroneous payments — the same charge paid more than once: an invoice re-submitted under a new number, a duplicate vendor record, a manual payment stacked on a system one, or a payment made against a credit already taken.
  • Price & terms variance — invoiced above the contracted price, or past the agreed cap.
  • Unclaimed credits & rebates — returns and rebate entitlements earned but never applied.

A secure, evidence-based recovery process

01

Secure data transfer

The client sends a one-time extract of historical AP data through a secure file-transfer portal. No system access, no integration.

02

First-pass anomalies delivered

About two weeks later, hunterAI returns the first pass in its portal — Power BI report pages detailing every anomaly, plus a full-field Excel export.

03

Confidence-scored, client-verified

Each anomaly carries a Priority 1 / 2 / 3 confidence tier. The AP team makes the final call in the client's own invoice repository, which hunterAI never accesses.

04

Supplier outreach & recovery

For confirmed duplicates, the team sends paired invoice evidence to the supplier and requests a credit. Recovery is prioritized by collectibility.

05

Feedback loop & re-runs

Confirmed and rejected results are fed back to hunterAI. Typically two or three more passes surface the remainder, up to a clean bill of health.

06

Process improvement

Confirmed errors become markers for the process gaps to close. Once addressed, the same anomalies stop recurring.

Recovered value and stronger AP control

Financial recovery

The analysis delivered $2.3M in incremental recovery, beyond anomalies already identified through the client's existing AP processes.

Working capital improvement

The client achieved approximately $500K in working capital improvement.

Operational transformation

Before hunterAIWith hunterAI
Selective sampling and manual invoice reviewsTransaction-level anomaly detection with 90% reduction in manual detection effort
Standard ERP controls could miss duplicates with slight invoice variationsExpanded anomaly detection contributed to an 80% reduction in invoice duplication
Payment issues were often identified after the factMonthly anomaly monitoring enables proactive detection and cost avoidance
Limited visibility into the process gaps behind recurring anomaliesSystemic control gaps identified across vendor records, supplier credits, invoice entry, and AP coding

From historical recovery to a continuous operating model

The historical analysis became the foundation for a new operating model rather than remaining a one-time recovery exercise.

Following the initial analysis, the client adopted monthly AP anomaly monitoring, moving from retrospective cash recovery toward proactive cost avoidance and tighter financial control.

The resulting data foundation can also support additional value-creation initiatives, including rebate recovery, GPO admin fee reconciliation, and category-level spend optimization.

SEE WHAT’S RECOVERABLE IN YOUR AP